When you download the file sent by the parliament dedicated to its incredible collaboration with the prosecutor's office of the republic on the occasion of the arrest of the deputy Ceylan Ibryamov…. you get a Word file. A series of personal data is allegedly deleted in it: to the one who handed over the “bribe” of Ibryamov, of the special inspector from the KPK. Hovering over the "delete" - the names and data that are allegedly hidden come out.
This commented on "Facebook" Polina Paunova.
Two important points here:
The first: According to the file sent by the National Assembly to the journalists, which contains data from the prosecutor's office, Ibryamov requested a gift, which he did not receive, of BGN 200,000 from Miroslav Valentinov Todorov. According to public data, until now Miroslav Todorov should have been detained because he was arrested in the summer on charges of tax crimes and money laundering. Miroslav Todorov was detained together with Plamen Paskov, Krasimir Zapryanov and Lyubima Stoyanova during an investigation by the GDBOP in August. In the same case, the jeep of the MP expelled from the DPS was seized – “Range Rover“. The car is owned by a company controlled by those arrested in August.
The main question here is whether the prosecutor's office did not resort to that old practice, in which: the accused is suddenly motivated to become a witness, committing outrages. And since we all know the answer, and it is obvious, we go to the second big moment.
According to the data sent by the parliament: “in the course of the investigation, numerous witnesses were questioned, and the indictment outlined in the reasoned request is supported by the oral evidence, the source of which is the protocol for the interrogation of the witness Georgi Yordanov Yordanov dated 03.10.2024 In the position of a special inspector in the KPK.
It details the operational activities carried out, as well as the fact that special intelligence assets (SIRs) were used, recreating the course of the investigation, as well as the content of the information acquired through the SIRs.
Here, in fact, is the main question: was a person with immunity - Jeyhan Ibryamov - illegally investigated?
His immunity has been lifted since yesterday, and the SRS, the marking of the money, which is also SRS, etc., took place before the date of removal of the legal protection that Ibryamov enjoys.
If this is so, we are at the epicenter of a scandal of an extraordinary scale, which practically says that the laws have no meaning. And their violation is a norm that can easily be described in a press release and not be unbearable for society.
Because: let's repeat again - for the time described in the press release, Ceyhan Ibryamov enjoys two immunities.
If someone wanted to investigate him, they should have requested these immunities in advance and acted to uncover the possible crime.
If someone has committed or intended to commit a crime, I personally, as a taxpayer in this country eaten by its own acid sauces, demand that he be investigated and tried fairly to bear his responsibility. This is done according to the rules. Without rules, it is neither an investigation, nor a court, nor can it bear responsibility. Because it's a showdown.