Is his choice correct if his first choice is to have his deputy be a policeman? This was commented on "Facebook" by Metodi Lalov.
To what extent does blind trust replace critical thinking when we choose who to represent us?
-How do you accept the fact that you support a figure raised and shaped as a direct product of the "assembly" with the sullen Borisov and Peevski?
-Have you forgotten that it was within the framework of these backstage agreements that he received his high post in the BNB?
-Doesn't it bother you that he was appointed caretaker prime minister by the Reshetnikov Iliana Yotova?
-Why do you silently ignore the fact that during his caretaker government, the bought vote undisturbedly flowed to Rumen Radev?
-How do you explain his choice for vice president to be a cadre with a heavy militia biography and mentality?
-Is it acceptable to you that Rumyana Bachvarova - a prominent Gerbadzhi friend of Borisov - was his chief of staff?
-How do you accept the claims of the so-called "democratic community", which tirelessly calls for "unity" and "not wasting votes", and failed even in the organization of fair preliminary elections?
-Why is this same community sabotaging the already nefarious attempts of the Forum for Democratic (in)action to nominate a single candidate, just to preserve its party plots?
-Don't you see a discrepancy between the loud speeches about principles and the practice of conjunctural agreements?