Last news in Fakti

Velislav Velichkov: Who created the boy, who gave him all the power?

The top of the bar does not yet serve Peevski, but there are lobbyist tendencies, he summarized

Sep 25, 2024 09:56 328

Velislav Velichkov: Who created the boy, who gave him all the power?  - 1

Who created "the boy", who gave him all the power?

The ball is in the court of Dogan and DPS, and what did the public learn from all this – we will see in the elections. Dogan spoke. The question is why is he talking now.

This was stated in an interview for BNR by lawyer Velislav Velichkov from the "Justice for Everyone" initiative. regarding the latest statements of the honorary chairman of the DPS.

In his words, Peevski has become "the most influential person in the state under the benevolent gaze of Ahmed Dogan":

"Who gave to society, who obliged society with Delyan Peevski? Who created "the boy", who gave him all the power? This question has been standing since 2013 – who. Dogan must say exactly how Peevski became so powerful, what mechanisms he worked on, what people he used, what crimes he committed, which oligarchs he was tied to. If he wants the public to start listening to him, he needs to come out with the facts, not bare declarations. The ball is in the court of Dogan and DPS, and what did the public learn from all this – we will see at the elections."

There are no criteria to determine attorneys' fees. The court, at its discretion, sometimes reduces the amounts of attorney's fees to critically low minimums, Velichkov pointed out on the subject of attorney's fees. According to him, a new regulation must be adopted by the Ministry of Justice and criteria must be introduced – not only the cost of the claim, on which to determine the amounts of these fees.

"Doubts are emerging that someone agreed with Delyan Peevski to help reject the presidential veto," commented Velislav Velichkov in the program "Before all".

Velichkov warns of "lobbyist tendencies" among the top management of the bar.

"The top of the bar does not serve Peevski yet. But I see such attempts. He has one side in the process – the prosecutor's office, that is why it is a titanic attempt to elect a new chief prosecutor. He misses the other side of the process – the bar. Imagine if the two parties in the external request process worked in sync?

Advocacy is very important – about 15,000 people across the country. It's a large group that can be tapped as a resource because of the influence of local attorneys, he suggested.