It is better to have a government than to have gone to new elections. People are tired. And the Caretaker Cabinet went too far with its attempts to become the most hated in history.
It was better for democratic parties to participate in the government than not to participate. Including for GERB.
This was written on "Facebook" by Lyubomir Alamanov.
It was better for the prime minister to be a supra-party consensus figure. It is difficult to achieve national unification with a party functionary.
It is better that the democratic parties did not fall into yet another trap of accepting a party functionary as prime minister. They are not in power, but they showed that this was not their goal.
It would have been better not to have so many ministers who were "objects of interest" by the prosecutor's office. They could end up in a situation of induced dependence.
It would have been better for political entities to have more stable principles and strategic directions, and not to tremble at the thought of absorbing funds.
It is better for democratic parties to make an honest self-assessment, to think about how to regain the trust of their voters and to prepare for the next local elections. They are only in two and a half years.
It is better for people to understand that by refusing to vote, they are not punishing anyone but themselves.
And yet, despite everything, it is better that we have a government than if we had gone to the elections again. At least it's clear who is responsible.