Dimitar Stoyanov before FACTS: The procedure for removing Ibryamov's immunity was not followed (VIDEO)

There are reflections on the arrest of Jeyhan Ibryamov. If we wait to provoke reflections with these declared opinions, then there are reflections even before they are declared. I am also of the opinion - without being a career lawyer - that the procedure for removing the immunities, because there are two of them, was not followed in the way it was intended according to the legislator. Procedure was flawed, in my opinion. Of course, this is my point of view. This is what he announced to Lili Marinkova in the "FACTS" studio. and the show “Conversation“ the journalist Dimitar Stoyanov from the website "Bivol".

“I believe that the pre-trial proceedings were procedurally flawed from the very beginning. Law enforcement took action they had no right to. After that, the identity of the witness who gave the marked money, as well as the very fact that there is marked money, leads us to think that this is one of an operation against a person with immunity, but before his immunity is removed. This means that when the time comes for this case to be considered in the judicial phase, it is most likely that this evidence will not be accepted by the court as suitable evidence. It all follows a well-known scenario where the KPK and the prosecution fight for the upper hand during the detention hearing. We have seen this many times. Similar scenarios have been played out. When the remand hearing is over and the case on the merits begins, those who maintain the charge fail. And finally we – taxpayers, we are paying before the European Court of Human Rights, and that is completely justified”, the guest added.

See more from the conversation in the VIDEO.