Link to main version

55

Artificial Intelligence Could Make War Deadlier Than Nuclear Weapons

Deterrence May Depend on Machines Responding Faster Than Humans Can Think

Снимка: БГНЕС/ЕРА
ФАКТИ публикува мнения с широк спектър от гледни точки, за да насърчава конструктивни дебати.

Nations are racing to develop weapons powered by artificial intelligence. This can be compared to the nuclear arms race of the 1940s, writes WION.

Nuclear weapons created the concept of mutually assured destruction. AI systems in warfare mean that adversaries will soon possess highly autonomous, fast-acting weapons. The trend is toward automating lethal decisions, with systems that can identify and engage targets without human intervention.

Artificial intelligence shortens decision-making cycles to improve battlefield speed, which at the same time increases the risk of accidental war. Escalation simulations show that autonomous systems can trigger unintended counterattacks.

Almost all of this is happening without much regulation or agreement. The United States and China committed in 2024 to retain human control over nuclear decisions, but there is no broad global treaty governing AI weapons. The private sector, especially startups and investors, is playing a leading role in AI weapons, unlike the state-dominated nuclear age.

AI weapons could be more dangerous than nuclear weapons. Unlike nuclear weapons, AI systems can operate in real time without human intervention and make decisions in seconds.

Availability is a double-edged sword. AI is more widely available than nuclear technologies, allowing many more countries and private companies to participate. AI systems are unpredictable and can behave in unpredictable ways.

There is no clear "end state" for AI weapons, much like the stockpiling of nuclear weapons in the arms race. Given the continuous nature of innovation, the concept of nuclear deterrence is evolving. It leads to "mutually automated destruction", where wars could be fought at machine speed and with minimal human control.

The US is pushing for the rapid deployment of AI in all branches of the military. According to reports, the US is investing over $13 billion in autonomous systems.

"Project Maven" is an AI system that analyzes data from drones and satellites and generates targets for strikes. AI-powered warfare is a major area of focus, with AI recommending weapons, calculating logistics, and generating strike plans in seconds. Maven has reportedly helped the US generate thousands of targets in recent conflicts.

Companies like Anduril, which makes autonomous drones, and Palantir, which develops AI-powered martial arts software, are supporting US efforts to wage war with AI.

China is likely to match the US in spending on AI in warfare. The country is merging its civilian and military forces. Private technology companies are also integrating into its defense.

China is developing drones that coordinate attacks without human intervention and brigades of AI-controlled vehicles. China is reportedly developing a "drone carrier" aircraft that can deploy drones in the air. Beijing has a huge manufacturing advantage to produce such weapons on a large scale. Artificial intelligence is seen as a "main battlefield" of geopolitical competition in China.

Russia is developing AI weapons for deterrence and parity and aims to automate 30% of its combat power. Russia's "Lancet" drones can select targets themselves. Russia is experimenting with autonomous decision-making on the battlefield, which has been used in the war in Ukraine. This capability has been used to refine and deploy AI systems in real combat. Russia is also testing unmanned combat vehicles in Syria, although some of these efforts have failed.

Ukraine has been forced to use AI in warfare because of its asymmetric war with Russia. Much of this involves cheap, modified amateur attack drones. Ukraine uses unmanned naval boats to counter the Russian fleet.

Ukraine has effectively turned the war with Russia into a virtual laboratory for artificial intelligence warfare. It has rapidly improvised and adapted artificial intelligence technologies for the war. It has shared battlefield data with companies like Palantir to train artificial intelligence systems to wage war.

Although many details are not publicly known, India is investing in military capabilities related to artificial intelligence. India is motivated by regional security concerns and the need to keep pace with China and other global powers.

Israel, which is known for integrating advanced intelligence and automation into warfare, is actively investing in military systems based on artificial intelligence. During the Iran conflict, it participated with the United States in AI-assisted targeting operations.

European countries such as France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Poland and Italy are exploring ways to rearm amid uncertainty about the United States' commitment to NATO. One key initiative is the joint development of air defense systems against drones. Their motivation is to reduce dependence on US military defense. Their approach is collaborative, regional defense development, not isolated national programs.

Wars of the future may be more of a struggle between algorithms than between humans. Deterrence may depend on machines reacting faster than humans can think.

Warfare with artificial intelligence is more widespread, less predictable, and constantly evolving. It may be more volatile than nuclear confrontation, even if it follows a similar logic of deterrence.