The dismemberment of "Majesty"

Who is the best in the party “Majesty” – Nikolay Markov or Ivelin Mihailov. This is the question that the people who voted for the "Greatness" party are asking themselves. And they also wonder how the promises of exposing the “evil” that is being created in the parliament by the system players, conquered the “fighters for freedom and justice” from “Majesty“ for aha month only. And how for just a month from the leader of the fight against “evil” Nikolay Markov wrote: "From today (note – the quote is from yesterday) I am ending my participation in all meetings with the public organized by PP "Velichie"!"

It is also interesting how from a like-minded person, collaborator, founder, ideologue, etc. Ivelin Mihailov became “… that PP "Majesty" is only and only Mr. Ivelin Mihailov and his pseudo economic group of straw and dependent people. As well as that the goals of this organization are neither partisan nor ideal". These are also the words of Nikolay Mihailov.

Between Ivelin Mikhylov and Nikolay Markov, not only sparks fly, but also heavy accusations flow with rather strained relations… And this only for a month of parliamentarianism. That's politics - no pity, no mercy, you have to be a predator to survive. Whoever is not ready, should not go to the forest, sorry to the parliament. The dismemberment of “Greatness” is a fact. A well-acted, well-thought-out scenario, because a small is small – he was also an idealist with a positive intention to fight against “evil”. Apparently, the little one just didn't realize how big (rich) “evil” is. And if we add to this the parliamentary inexperience, this is how one becomes easy prey.

Let's also remember what Nikolay Markov said to FACTS immediately after the elections:
- How sure are you about the people who will become deputies, and how encapsulated your group will be, because we know that the small parties in the parliament are interested in the “big players” and it often leads to a split?
- We have no worries for now, because I don't think that the systemic parties intend to form a government.

- Why?
- Such are the signals they emit. I'm not saying this will happen, but those are the signals. At the moment, a government, which would be realized by the big ones with an annex to them ITN, has to make decisions related to serious commitments on the part of Bulgaria, which they do not want to bear.

And what happened just a month later…