With the constitutional changes, we wanted to limit the possibility of one-man rule through the executive power. At the same time, we elect a person who is close to the president as chairman of the National Assembly. Why did we change the Constitution then? We constantly compromise and then suffer. Perhaps we will support governance with the BSP, albeit difficult. This is what the chairman of the SDS, Rumen Hristov, said in the program “On focus”.
According to him, it is naive to believe that Radev will not choose Assoc. Kiselova for caretaker prime minister. “There was no problem that I voted against Kiselova, Borisov said that the decision was mine. GERB-SDS and PP-DB could not understand each other. This is how we allowed BSP to get back into the game again. If we had an agreement, at each vote we would have two candidates in the runoff. The winner of the election was supposed to nominate the Speaker of the National Assembly, but this did not happen. The first two political forces had to reach an agreement on a cabinet, with ITN and the support of the BSP it could have happened. I have reservations about supporting the APS”, he commented.
In his words, ”three or four people are warming up along the sideline, ready to fight for the position of chief prosecutor”.
He also took stock 35 years after the creation of the SDF. “One of the great mistakes of the SDF is that we did not adopt a law on lustration. We apologize for that. The BSP was very strong, it managed to introduce a lot of its own people into the SDF, who got in the way, says Hristov.