PP: The in-house is problematic when it is awarded to a state company, and it subcontracts to a private one

Regarding the information disseminated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications “MRRB sent ADFI two in-house contracts concluded by the previous leadership of the ministry”, in order to clarify the facts it is necessary to make several clarifications, reported the press center of "We continue the change", quoted by novini.bg.

During the mandate of Andrey Tsekov, the state, in the person of the MRRD, assigns its specialized unit NCTR to perform a service within the scope of its competence and capabilities. This company did not outsource its tasks to private companies, but hired additional employees under labor contracts. Public funds remain in the public sphere and do not flow to private companies, a practice GERB imposed during 12 years of administration.

In-house is problematic when the state outsources to a state-owned company, and it subcontracts the corresponding amount of work to a private company. It is according to this vicious model that during the time of GERB funds were siphoned off for the “Hemus“ highways. and Vidin – Botevgrad.

The acting Minister of Regional Development and Public Works, Violeta Koritarova, has accepted the role of a puppet on strings in the hands of GERB and DPS. Apparently, the bosses assigned her to “create“ fabricated mirror scandal on the topic of inhouse in order to discredit their political opponent.

Koritarova should publicly answer why, after the same internal audit unit in the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications established that all orders for ongoing road repairs worth over BGN 4 billion, launched by the previous caretaker government, were carried out in flagrant violations of the Law on Public orders (ZOP), today it requests to resume the awarding of these orders. And why was ADFI not notified about this action?