Let's let the PP-DB decide how to react. It was a historic moment for someone, but I warn them, because it can turn the minds of many people into thinking that this uniqueness is only for them, and self-overestimation is no less a problem than self-underestimation.
This commented on "Facebook" Iliyan Vassilev.
1. Whether with Peevski or without him, the backstage is looking for its new model, which will reward the old one and make it acceptable, especially as optics, for the public. Dogan will not become a democrat, neither Radev nor Borisov. The theme with "sincere cooperation" it is not going well. Like oil and water cannot mix.
Don't let it happen as often before - small tactical battles are won, but strategic ones are lost.
I know, I know, they will tell you that victory comes in small steps. This was the song for 30 years of transition - to have the feeling that small steps have led to "victory".
2. For the above reasons - the backstage needs time to put some "jajamia" in power until they reorganize and find the new formula and the new faces. The shock with Peevski is huge and they will need time to reach a new agreement, at least until they excommunicate Peevski from the "elite". If they can at all. Even if there is agreement on some changes with them, they will remain superficial and will be removed the moment the new consensus of the deep state is reached. What about the constitutional changes. The true nature of these people is revealed in the events of SOS - when they loot collectively and with everything they have as tools.
3. Among the democratic community, there will always be "missionaries", idealists who will want to do a lot for a little while, even sacrifice themselves, without realizing that they are not changing anything essential. Co-opting into the "elite" it becomes imperceptible. The mere exercise of some power is sufficient to bind irrevocably, or at least in a manner which will then produce discrediting propaganda.
For this - look at the strategic victory, not the fleeting political vanity, that you are very important and the world depends on you.
Whatever there is, I have told it to the leaders of the PPDB - the fact is that things have become more complicated with the second mandate, but only at first glance.
The important topic is how to win the maximum number of voters, and through them, deputies and power. Only then can changes become lasting and deeply meaningful. If you compare the two paths - before negotiations on current positions and on a new distribution of forces after new elections, with the right moves - you will reach the decision.
What do you think?