"I hoped that there would be no intensive intervention by the court. But this malevolence that reigns... If everyone was concerned about the electoral process as offering ideas to the voters, things would be very easy. Our voters are not in the accounts of the leaders," said Adv. Ludmil Rangelov in the show "The Day ON AIR".
What decision will they make about the two DPS
He pointed out that it is not in the interest of the two factions in the DPS to take their disputes to the CEC and to the court. According to him, their problems are how they will attract the electorate to vote for one or the other coalition.
"The faction behind Mr. Peevski appears as a coalition of two parties. The other coalition has coined "Democracy for Rights and Freedoms". The abbreviation is optional. Unfortunately, it is not a decision of one faction. It depends on the parliamentary group," the lawyer explained to Bulgaria ON AIR.
According to him, it comes down to who rules the court.
"If the two factions argue and the matter is transferred to the Supreme Court, the decision will be for Mr. Peevski's faction. If the politicians have a basic concern for the people and the future of the country, they should put an end to it. The struggle has been limited to who will own the relevant structure," stressed Adv. Rangelov.
The interlocutor is of the opinion that if you politically control the prosecutor's office, you can guarantee impunity for people who buy and sell votes.
Convicted 15-20 people are ridiculous numbers for that mass. The purchase is made with money and some buy more, said the lawyer. Rangelov.
Will Rumen Gaitanski be found guilty - Wolf
The guest admitted that he was surprised by the decision to leave Rumen Gaitanski in custody.
"I'm not that surprised after seeing the bench. It is not legally justified. When you accuse a person of having received a large and unsecured loan by inciting another from the bank to grant it to him, there must be a different type of evidence, which is not commented on at all," explained Adv. Rangelov.
He is of the opinion that it is dangerous for Gaitanski Stoyan Mavrodiev to return as a protected witness in the case.
"Against Mr. Mavrodiev, I assume that other grounds can be found for seeking criminal responsibility, apart from those related to Gaitanski. If they grant him amnesty and he is willing to testify to get off, such schemes are made by the powerful. I bet that Mr. Gaitanski will not have an effective sentence for this accusation", said the lawyer. Rangelov.