"I did not believe that the so-called assembly will fall apart and we will get to an emergency election. But once the logic is broken, we must prepare from now on for big surprises and that the next parliament will be very little like the current one. Things will change significantly. We will have a fundamentally different configuration of the parliamentary structure. In any case, PP will not be able to maintain its status as a key factor."
Sociologist Yury Aslanov expressed this opinion to the BNR.
According to him, "the main culprits for getting here because of the constitutional changes" now they are also the biggest opponents of the "Glavchev" cabinet. and "perhaps excuses are now being prepared for the inevitable worse outcome of PP". According to him, it was in the interest of the PP-DB that the two votes were held separately, because if the European elections preceded the national ones, this would minimize their damage to the national ones.
"Neither the Minister of the Interior nor the Ministry of the Interior makes the elections. The Ministry of Internal Affairs is solely responsible for curbing well-known vicious practices and for safeguarding the electoral process. He has no role in manipulating results or falsifying data," Aslanov said and described the upcoming elections as very difficult.
"We have big differences between electoral lists for parliamentary and European elections. This will create not only technical problems. This will put us in a tizzy. On top of that, we also vote in a mixed way – with machines and paper ballots. There will be chaos in the polling stations," the sociologist warned.
The two months until the elections are charged with the potential for scandals that have already started, in which key names from the PP are involved, and this will further change electoral attitudes, commented Aslanov.
It is clear that there will be no conversation between the politicians and the people, therefore the voter turnout will be lower and this will benefit "part of the players who are motivated to prove themselves" – GERB, DPS, "Vazrazhdane", BSP, probably also ITN, he added.
Everything is talked about before the elections and very little of it happens after the elections, Yuriy Aslanov reminded, expressing a "premonition that the result of the elections will surprise everyone and make a large part of the pre-election talk meaningless".< /strong>
"The one who starts a conversation with the people, not as part of the bickering between political forces, will win."
On June 9, we should refrain from participating as mimans, because the people do not have this function. A very important issue will be activity – how many of us will not behave in politics like seir and try as a society and citizens to make the necessary corrections.
This position took place in "Above all" political scientist Assoc. Albena Taneva, lecturer at Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski".
In times of crisis, populism always has more chances. If in the next 2 months the threshold of the feeling of crisis is lowered, populism will also lower its score, she pointed out.
"Opportunities are constantly presented to increase the tension in society even more in a pre-election situation. Instead of politics, we have an occasion to talk about crime plots. Someone is an extremely skilled manipulator. We keep having the same systemic problem. "Society is strengthening and starting to become less naive," comments Prof. Taneva.
"The two subjects must be equally brought to our attention. The more people go to vote, the less the script teams will get what they set out to do on the same scale."
The caretaker government should dispel the feeling that elections and the Ministry of Interior are the two most closely related concepts, she also stated.