The potential possibility of reaching a constitutional crisis exists, and all analysts are taking this into account, but I am optimistic that we will get out of this situation. It seems to me that in this particular case we will skip, which does not mean that in a similar one this will happen. This commented in the studio of "The day begins" the former constitutional judge and professor of constitutional law Prof. Plamen Kirov.
"Some sense will prevail, since it is obvious that there are different opinions on a constitutional text, that means there is a problem with the constitutional text. About the Constitution - it should be clear and precise so that it can be applied unambiguously. And the very fact that there are so many different opinions shows that there are problems with the constitutional text. Who can solve them - only the Constitutional Court, but we are yet to hear its decision when it decides on the cases related with the possible unconstitutionality of the provisions, of the amendments", Prof. Kirov explained.
According to him, when there is no agreement to form a government from the parliament, the president conducts consultations with the parliamentary groups and then starts a procedure to appoint a caretaker government and together with that schedules new elections.
"The sequence is this - early elections are not scheduled first, but first it is understood who will enter an office and then early elections are scheduled. This is how the text is read, such a conclusion can be reached. Not only the politicians, but also the polled voters prefer 2 in 1 elections," said Prof. Plamen Kirov.