"I believe that there will be a speaker of the parliament before the Christmas holidays, but I cannot commit to which figure it will be." ;. Political scientist Assoc. Ivo Indjov.
"The procedure must be unblocked. The National Assembly has been working for a month, and we still have an artificially inflated first session. Even those who sabotage the election of the president and slow the ball for new elections suffer image damage. The parliament cannot continue to function in this situation, because in addition to the crisis of the party system, we also have a crisis of parliamentary democracy.
This masquerade that takes place in the National Assembly repels many sober-minded voters. It becomes a guarantee of a low voter turnout of early elections knocking on the door and increases the supporters of a new savior, a firm hand, a way out of the crisis by changing the government, etc.".
I don't think that in the short term there can be a coalition between GERB and DPS-New Beginning, said Injov.
After Peevski supported the candidacy of Assoc. Kiselova, she is already doomed, the political scientist also explained.
"If the same players remain, the winning bid would be Silvi Kirilov".
We do not know which candidates will make it to the runoff, but we see that the rift between PP and DB is growing, he pointed out.
"They have already voted differently several times".
The means available to those who do not want Borislav Sarafov to be elected chief prosecutor - both legislatively and through the actions of the Constitutional Court, are quite limited, Indjov explained.
"The great sin of the PP-DB is that, as the main governing party during the assembly, they did not show the political will to start changing the parliamentary quotas of the regulators. If it had been done, perhaps Sarafov's choice would not have been announced.
There is reason in the president's request to return to the old situation before the changes made to the Constitution, the political scientist believes.
"The old formula of an official cabinet turned out to be much more efficient than the new one with the so-called "home book" that turns the election of the Speaker of the Parliament into a hostage of complex calculations. This is unacceptable".
The course is clear – new early elections, summarized Ivo Injov.