Measure three times, cut once.
This principle of making statements, with at least a comparative degree of credibility, is completely alien to the “good force” We Continue the Change.
That is why we have heard Kiril Petkov's claim hundreds of times that a “sanitary cordon” is being created around Peevski because he “stole 300,000 votes” in the last elections, apart from the fact that he is bad in principle.
And this thesis was “scientifically proven” from the same with the “indisputable fact” that you can't have 300,000 votes if your personal rating is 2%.
This was commented on her Facebook page by PR expert Diana Damyanova. She also wrote the following:
Now, however, a sociological agency close to the PP measures Peevski's rating at 8%, which fully corresponds to the 300,000 votes received, just as Kiril Petkov's rating of 10% approval fully corresponds to the 330,000 votes received.
In politics, in addition to making statements, you also have to argue them relatively well, because otherwise your rating gradually drops and when it approaches Peevski's, how can I say, you become equally important, and Rudi - Gela overtakes you at the speed of light.
With this, I conclude the political statements for the year, warmly congratulate the Leninist party for its endless successes and devote myself to preparations, because about a dozen people will visit the home of the man and the monster on New Year's Eve.