Yesterday's decision of the SAC put an end to an agony that started from the first minutes of party registration for the upcoming early parliamentary elections. We looked at battle scenes that we had not seen in the corridors of the National Assembly, namely a battle over who would sit down first to submit an application. It turned out that this battle had to be fought because we saw in the SAC's decision that the main weight of the decision was which application came first. This is what he announced to Lili Marinkova in the "FACTS" studio. and the show “Conversation“ Tsvetelina Penev from the Public Council at the CEC.
„Another interesting thing in the work of the CEC is the submitted application 0.05 hours. We remember that the CEC unanimously refused to register this application of the “DPS– A new beginning“. They had submitted only an electronic application without supporting documents. And already during the day they accepted the documents of the two factions in the DPS with a paper application and the complete set of documents, but without an incoming number. Then the CEC, after a long meeting on September 4, unanimously refused to register both coalitions with the available documents. And so the matter came to YOU, where something interesting also happened. When there are cases of significant public interest in the Supreme Court, concerning CEC decisions - such as the decision to cancel the machine voting from October 2023, representatives of the CEC appeared at the case to defend their thesis. Why was there no CEC representative in the case before the Supreme Court? Why? The CEC had unanimously taken the decision to refuse registration of the two collations, but now they did not appear before the judges to give their reasons. Now we have seen the motives of one side, but we have not seen the weight of the CEC's motives. This also casts a shadow over the impartial decision of the Supreme Court“, added the guest.
See more of the conversation in the VIDEO.