On the day when a message was published that the court had decided the case for cashing the elections in favor of Mr. Terziev, the chief architect of the capital, Zdravko Zdravkov, left.
- the most serious criticisms of the previous administration are for the reconstruction of Sofia, why did Zdravkov continue to be the chief architect for another 9 months?
- quite often at a session the PP-DB-SS group convinces us NOT to support reports of their chief architect. Why did he continue to occupy this key position?
This is what the BSP municipal councilor Vanya Grigorova wrote on her Facebook page. She continued her comment as follows:
Perhaps Terziev felt at ease about his place and therefore released him? No, his dependencies are too big. Not only will we appeal the court's decision because the elections were not fair. But Terziev is still a partner in companies, which can be seen by anyone in the Commercial Register. Why hasn't the OIC made a decision yet, after several regional mayors have already been removed specifically for participating in companies?
As long as a municipality and state are governed by dependent people, the decisions will never be in the interest of society