Judging by the mood on social networks, the public is deeply angry about the Agreement that acting Prime Minister Gurov signed on his own in Kiev.
You will hardly find a naive person who would support Gurov's initiative - and it is pure arbitrariness.
This was commented on "Facebook" by Kevork Kevorkian.
Along with this crazy story, I remembered a word - it is in Oksana Dvornichenko's book "Hitler. As I Knew Him".
From one episode in it we learn the following: on the night of May 1, 1945, Marshal Zhukov woke Stalin up by phone and told him that Hitler had committed suicide. And Stalin said: “The scoundrel was joking!“ “
"He was joking" - that's the word I came up with.
Today, who can we ask ourselves if he was "joking"? For Russophobes, this must be Putin, but what about his friend Trump - what about him?
Here it is appropriate to recall a fragment from Bob Woodward's book "War" /quote/:
“In early 2024, one of Trump's associates is standing in front of the former president's office in Mar-a-Lago. Trump has asked him to leave the room in order to have, in his own words, a personal telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to the aide in question, there have been a number of such calls between the two since Trump left the White House in 2021 - perhaps as many as seven.
In July /the same year/ Bob Woodward asked Jason Miller, the Trump campaign spokesman, if he knew about the phone call between Trump and Putin. The answer is that he was not aware.
- Can Trump talk to Putin now?
- I'm sure they know how to contact each other.
- Are they discussing how to stop the war in Ukraine?
- President Trump has said he will stop it and I think he is capable. I think he can stop it before he even takes office - Miller replies" /end of quote/.
In the epilogue of his book, Woodward writes that when he wakes up in the morning, his first thought is: “What are the bastards hiding?“
It is quite natural for us to ask ourselves: have they played a trick - and is it possible to understand this at all?
Let's get back to our Gyurov. It is not difficult to understand his calculations. But we must be aware that people of this breed exist according to standards and moral criteria that are completely different from the generally accepted ones - otherwise they would not be suitable for the positions they are assigned.
Some are now trying to present Gyurov almost as a champion of the Ukrainian cause, but this is pure nonsense - he is simply an arrogant violator of the Constitution, which assigns him very modest powers and within an extremely limited term.
In this sense, he is first and foremost misleading, to put it mildly, the Ukrainians, and our people are some kind of aborigines who do not interest him at all. People like him are sure that they have already finally gotten used to the arbitrariness of the authorities and accept it as something normal.
The goal of rulers like Gyurov is for the "aborigines" to see everything as a "ala-bala" and they will no longer understand what abomination they are dealing with.
Distract the common people, deceive them, confuse them and finally drive them completely crazy - they need crazy people, that's the only thing they are aware of.
Well, yes, the People, as always, will again be the main victim, will again be sadistically forced to lose the last remnants of respect for the institutions and their Gyurovites. This has already happened, to a large extent - all that remains is to put the final point on the final rift between the People and the State.
We do not need to overestimate what Gyurov has done, but it would be frivolous not to see the opportunities that his self-rule opens up for the next, even more arrogant intruder.
Some assess his adventure simply as a sign of loyalty, in return for which he is expected to receive some sweet spot in the countless Euro-bureaucratic pockets, where nothing decent is stirred up, but no one cares about it.
For Gyurov, a special management position in some neat Western bank would not be a bad compensation for the whole theater with the Ukrainians. Just as Kuneva once sacrificed herself to go to work at "Paribas" - after closing two of the units of our nuclear power plant.
However, the memory of the liquidator Kuneva reminds me of something else. She will certainly be among the top three winners in a nationwide poll "Who are the biggest enemies of the Transition?"
It is important to leave such a testimony in order to see how sober and resilient the People's Memory is - and to what extent it is subject to the deceptions of the Transition.
Let's not think of Gyurovtsi and Gyurovitsi, although theirs is not easy either. Kuneva, for example, must have possessed a special talent to cripple - just while she was the EU's consumption commissioner /!!!/ - an entire nuclear power plant!
And in this way to ensure that the "aboriginals" will have unbearable bills in the future, and the energy security of the state will become a myth - something we have already witnessed.
Compared to Kuneva, Gyurov looks like a rude village mayor. We should be proud of her, of her...
But we are getting distracted again. Or we stare in exactly the wrong direction, some inexplicable stupidity makes us stare at trifles, at petty villains - in general, at the filth, in which, in the end, everything loses its outline and meaning.
And perhaps the monument that we should finally dedicate to ourselves should look like a gaping mouth - gaping at who knows what.
Otherwise, the goal has been achieved - they have turned us into a gathering, eternally distracted by the same eternal parties, arranged by old and new idiots, and we no longer even smell the stench that spreads from all this.
And soon there will be no one to even ask how some scoundrels managed to do this to us?