"The Cabinet is not non-partisan. But only one party does not have influence in it.
This opinion was expressed before the BNR by the political scientist Ruzha Raycheva. She also predicted that the cabinet "Glavchev" will stick around longer than expected.
A similar position was expressed by the political scientist Ivan Nachev, according to whom it became clear when the cabinet was formed that only a person connected to GERB could lead it.
"This is the government of the president, the GERB and the DPS".
Rajcheva believes that the MFA reshuffle is "as vague and murky as everything else that is happening".
"I don't know how the prime minister will do his job on both fronts".
The political scientist pointed out that Vanya Grigorova has a real chance to be the new leader of the left.
"Cornelia Ninova does not hide her fear of her. Worryingly, however, the left has fragmented. They may fail en masse".
In the next parliamentary elections, Raycheva predicts that there will be a wider unification on the left.
Nachev, on the other hand, thinks that the left's chances, outside of the BSP, are very small.
"It is not good for the political process itself to have a weak left party".
Political scientists also commented on the nomination of Elena Yoncheva for MEP from DPS.
"These unconventional moves are related to attracting more voters for the Movement,", Nachev thinks.
According to Raicheva, this move is very symbolic.
"It is no coincidence that Yoncheva was promoted by DPS-Blagoevgrad. This is Peevski's bastion. I understand it as his self-promotion in front of everyone".
After the elections, GERB very much want to continue together with PP-DB, Raycheva pointed out.
Nachev, on the other hand, sees a desire in Borisov's party to work for the destruction of PP.
"A hug with GERD is deadly.
The next election seems more likely. We are doomed to coalition governments in the coming years."
For Raicheva, the office "Glavchev" will accumulate negatives and become a political player.
She expects more corruption scandals and a muddy campaign, as well as lower voter turnout, and then - difficult negotiations.
Nachev, on the other hand, sees in the scandals and the war of compromises preparation for achieving winning positions by parties that are not pro-European.