Milena VARBANOVA
A few days ago, the scientific website bulgarianscienceproblems published my article "Subject "Faith" and the subject "Virtues and Religions" are fundamentally different concepts", after which a discussion flared up in the forum.
One of the participants in it commented on my text with the words: "We still cannot decide on the issue, because we don't know who is at the beginning - the asteroid or God". This mocking remark, which behind the arrogant facade of "scientific skepticism" equates and even places the Creator lower than a piece of stone, provoked me to address the following response to its author:
Dear Gentlemen,
I had decided not to participate in the comments in the forum, but Mr. T.'s opinion makes me break the promise I made to myself.
The thesis about the "asteroid", which supposedly brought to Earth "spores of life" (or something similar) from another celestial body or "simply from space", is very easily debunked. It is enough to ask: how did life originate on "the other planet" or "in space"? It immediately becomes clear that this "asteroid" thing is a simple avoidance of the question of how life appeared on Earth - a fraudulent trick, a sophistry that aims to veil the real problem - what is the source of life (on Earth, on the "asteroid", on the "other planet"), where do the beginnings of living nature (and of "dead nature", because today it is known that there is no dead nature - neither water nor land is "dead nature"), of living beings and man come from?
Asking the question of who is at the beginning - "the asteroid or God" - is just as comical and absurd in 2025 as asking "how many devils can fit on the tip of a needle" - a question that "scientists" they asked themselves in the Middle Ages, not jokingly.
Only a century and a half ago (not even that much) the answer to this question was clear - God is the creator of the Universe, the Earth, living beings and man. However, the propaganda of Darwin's evolutionary theory - deliberately imposed by the "secret societies" in order to affirm atheism (for the consumption of the rest of humanity, and not for themselves - they never believed in evolutionism) - led to a sincere denial of the existence of God. The fallacies of sciences such as physics and biology, which at the end of the 19th century did not yet have the necessary foundation and current technologies for research work, "confirm" the atheistic philosophy that life originated "by chance", that species are the result of evolution and "natural selection", etc.
At the beginning of the 21st century. With the rapid development of science, a new stage of knowledge was reached and it was understood that there was never any "evolutionism", that species defined as "intermediate" and "extinct" still exist today, that 65 chromosomes distance all animal species from the single-celled creature, therefore species did not originate from each other, etc., etc. The discoveries of the famous Russian scientist Pyotr Garyaev are a huge step forward in the knowledge of the creation of man and all living beings, that words are able to change DNA, just as ancient authors (e.g. John the Theologian) wrote - "God is the Word". Speech and thought are in man from his very creation - he never mumbled inarticulately. Professor Garyaev is also the author of another secret discovery - that every person carries within himself "a cell of God".
More and more astonishing evidence is being discovered for the existence of ancient civilizations - who lived on Earth before the human race and possessed an extremely high level of intelligence and technological capabilities. It is now clear that "secret societies", whose weapon is, for example, the criminal Smithsonian Institute, have been robbing, hiding and destroying for centuries the relics left over from the Atlantean race and the intelligent races before it. Suffice it to mention the astonishing recent discovery of deep structures under the pyramids, evidence of an underground nuclear power plant from prehistoric times in Gabon, megalithic structures in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia and so many others.
The development of deep-sea research on the sea and ocean floor is also constantly complementing the picture of the intelligent past of planet Earth, which did not begin 100 thousand years ago with Australopithecus. The theory that humans evolved from apes was invented to humiliate man and all of God's creation. The mythologies of various peoples around the world clearly state that all human races believed in creationism and even provide numerous details on how exactly man was created.
No mythology reports that we descended from monkeys, and in four thousand years of recorded human history, there has not been a single case reported of a monkey turning into a human. It has been proven that the notorious Darwinian mutation of genes, from which higher species originate, is not confirmed in reality. If a mutation occurs, it only leads to degeneration. The possibility of "spores of life" falling "accidentally" on Earth and from them sprouting everything that today inhabits the planet is a million times smaller than that chimpanzee copying the Bible without error 400 times.
In this forum, you are all scientists, mostly in the field of exact disciplines. Surely you know better than I, the humanitarian, how great today's scientific achievements are and that they do not contradict faith, but on the contrary - confirm its ancient wisdom.
The colossal evolutionist nonsense, in which humanity was forced to believe through its indiscriminate intrusion into the educational system of nations, aims - as I wrote above - to impose atheism and materialism as the basic human worldview. This is a direct path to the degradation of the human race, because materialism does not build virtues, but vices - greed, ingratitude, meanness, selfishness, a complete lack of compassion. What is left of man when he is deprived of humanity, what does he become? We see it in today's reality - man becomes a beast to the weaker and a plasmodium to the stronger. "Successful" is the one who has accumulated more material goods through crimes, "loser" and "fool" is the spiritual person, the altruist, the penniless, the believer, the Christian. These are the criteria of materialism and godlessness. Where has this bacchanalia led us? To transhumanism and ultimately to Satanism. Because the one who does not believe in God inevitably falls into the trap and power of Satan. The horse-tails of atheism are a wonderful cover for his - Satan's - existence. It has been said - the devil's greatest victory is that he made people think that there is no devil.
The Earth is a living being in direct connection with the Spiritual World and the Creator. If this thread of grace is broken - through disastrous unbelief and delusion, the human race will perish in its own filth. The Earth, which was created to be a home for loving and responsible people before its Creator, will also perish. I will repeat what I wrote in my article - virtues have a spiritual, ideal origin, they can be educated and preserved only through unshakable faith in God. The claims of Krasimir Valchev - current head of the Ministry of Education and Science, that the "non-confessional", optional subject "virtues and religions" will not be based on faith, but "will only educate in goodness", are untenable. What "good" can exist outside of God and the Spiritual World, which is the source of all virtues?
I think - why did some people become addicted to atheism like a drug, cling to it, grow into it, without necessarily being communists, globalists, Euro-Atlantics and Sorosoids - that is, without having financial and power benefits from it? And I answer myself - atheism is the only "religion" according to which everything ends with the end of earthly life. Whatever crimes you have committed, you die without being responsible for them. There is no God's judgment, no hell. It is even better if you managed to avoid earthly justice.
I knew atheists who confidently dragged their asteroid or their monkey all their lives. And all of them, on the verge of death, begged God for forgiveness.
In conclusion, I will recall the old irrefutable argument for the existence of God - when we enter a house in which perfect order reigns, what does that mean - that it has a master, right?